WHAT IS WRONG WITH BIASED JOURNALISTS ANYWAY?

Linda Bryans is attracting a bit of publicity because she is not allowed to present UTV news programmes as her husband is standing as a candidate for Cameron`s Chatham House Lundy party. Her husbands website Mike Nesbitt.

Why are "Journalists and broadcasters" not allowed to be bias. I would much rather listen to an openly bias "Unionist" journalist or an openly bias "Republican" journalist than some sanctimonious liar who tries to pretend he, she, or it is totally unbias, objective and unpredudicial.
As Ken Ham, of Answers in Genesis, says, "It is not a matter of whether or not one is biased, but which bias is the best bias to be biased with anyway."

Jim Allister should coax Linda Bryans to stand as TUV candidate in N.Belfast. There are already widespread rumours she was a member of a "marching band" in her youth. She has spoken out on Mental Helath issues from personal experience. There is a high percentage of "Mental Health" patients in N.Belfast. Just for good measure she is known to have attanded a "Pink Presbyterian Church" at least once in her life.

It would add abit of spice to the Nesbitt home. Who owns UTV anyway? They would not be bias toward any sinister political objectives would they?

The Linda Bryans you were not meant to see!



The ultimate end of the so-called "unbiased."
Revelation 3:16
16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.