Note the handsign used by the Antichrist in this picture. I suppose PopeLundy1 does not know what this means? He probably does not know who the sordid character below is either or the political damage he has done to Unionism in N.Ireland!
PopeLundy1 is now a fully functioning tool of the Antichrist. He is deceiving the citizens of the UK especially the Protestants of N.Ireland by claiming the proposed Antichrist visit is a mystery which no one in government knows anything about.
The Antichrist controls the intelligence agencies which control the UK government through its front agency "The Royal Institute Of Foreign Affairs."
Just watch all these characters who he claims, "do not want anything to do with it," queue up to be seen with the Antichrist when he arrives. I suppose PopeLundy1 does not know Chris Patten is presently organising the visit?
"But I don't know how it has been done because they have had it all secret. Nobody knows who made the thing. You go and ask a question of any minister and he says he doesn't want to have anything to do with it.
You notice he does not rebuke the Queen for her intention to meet the AC ??????
What else but lies can you expect from the man who publicly stated this in 2004.
Just watch all these characters who he claims, "do not want anything to do with it," queue up to be seen with the Antichrist when he arrives. I suppose PopeLundy1 does not know Chris Patten is presently organising the visit?
"But I don't know how it has been done because they have had it all secret. Nobody knows who made the thing. You go and ask a question of any minister and he says he doesn't want to have anything to do with it.
You notice he does not rebuke the Queen for her intention to meet the AC ??????
What else but lies can you expect from the man who publicly stated this in 2004.
You just cannot help wondering what Kincora was all about can you? Here is some food for thought, though you will have to use your own judgement as to the veracity. It may take a few seconds for this page to load. Scroll down until you come to the "Kincoragate" section.
Revelation 17:1-31 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
5 comments:
Sam,
More dissembling deceit from Ian Paisley.
As always Sam, you have well-spoken and I for one, appreciate your candor.
What kind of fools does he take us for? ?
Some fellow at SA attributes Paisley's lukewarm comments regarding the "pope" to his advanced age . . he thinks the "big man" has just "mellowed"!
I don't buy it for a minute . . he's knows full well what he's saying!
As to this remark:
"But I don't know how it has been done because they have had it all secret. Nobody knows who made the thing. You go and ask a question of any minister and he says he doesn't want to have anything to do with it.
****
I think he's developed lying to an artform, or maybe he's using the R.C. tactic of "mental reservation". In either case, it is incredulous.
Re: Kincora, I'll follow the link later . . it really is nauseating.
Kindest Regards,
Mrs. O'Leary
mrs;
The section about Kincoragate does mention an individual called David Holden "a journalist." If you do the research will find he was a lot more than a journalist.
It does illustrate just how trustworthy these so-called journalists are.
Sam,
In the speech Paisley gave in 2004,
he said:
"The DUP stands ready to enter real talks, provided total decommissioning has been accomplished. Without that there is no future peace in Northern Ireland. The IRA are busy, aided and abetted by Dublin, notching up a further victory, gaining another raft of concessions and taking another step in the destruction of our place in this island. Make no mistake about it, it is war to the end. It is a matter of life and death, freedom or bondage, whether we shall be serfs of Dublin or free citizens of Britannia.
In the election campaign a certain journalist insisted in putting to me the question which has been asked over and over again, ‘Will you talk with IRA/Sinn Fein?’ I caught him by the lapels of the coat and told him in no uncertain language ‑ NEVER! and never it is!
‘To talk is not to negotiate’, they cry. We have seen that in the fate of the Unionist Party!
That Party had its back broken by such talks. IRA/Sinn Fein must learn that there is a price to be paid by them for a place at the table and until they get rid of the guns on the table, under the table and outside the doors of the negotiating chamber they will have no place in the talks. They have a choice to make, and until they make it the door of democracy is locked against them."
*******
Doesn't Paisley maintain that his pre-requisite to enter into talks with SF / IRA of full de-commissioning was met, prior to his meeting with Gerry Adams?
Do you believe full de-commissioning has taken place?
From what I've read, the populace of N.I. does not believe it has!
Await your response,
Mrs. O'Leary
mrs;
No I do not think "full decommissioning" ever took place. Over the past few months even those who had been most strident in declaring it had have been tacitly admitting it did not.
But the damage has been done, IRA/MI5 could openly state they still have arms and the two Lundy parties would still not insist they should be excluded from government.
Hi Sam,
I do believe I caught the tail end of the Nolan interview with Ian Paisley on BBC Radio last night. It was very late, so I didn't listen to the whole thing.
I can't get it on the Internet, but it is broadcast a day later on BBC Radio.
He seemed somewhat uneasy with the questions posed to him.
I also noticed the article at Bel Tel regarding the interview and the comments were none to favorable to him.
The news item at Sermon Audio entitled 'Pope Benedict's visit to UK a "mistake" - Paisley' was closed. There were 7 comments there before it was shut down, and now only four remain.
The three that were deleted were unfavorable. Surprise, surprise!
John Yurich, a self-avowed R.C. who posts there regularly, referred to Paisley as "Pastry", I think by mistake, and called him a bigot, along with some other derogatory remarks.
Tony Cisneros, another regular poster over there chided Paisley for his weak denunciation of the R.C. church, contrasted with his former position and Ehud came along with his usual cryptic, but clearly unfavorable comments about Paisley. These were the three that were removed.
With Paisley's "elevation to the House of Lords" this week, I'm sure SA will be posting an article, and predictably, if any derogatory comments are posted
they will close the thread.
Mrs. O'Leary
Post a Comment