Alan Cairns has unleashed a barrage of messages dealing with the sins of Babylonianism. It has become most wearying listening to Pink Presbyterians enthuiastically set about the sins of others when they do not seem to recognise it or deal with it in their own denomination.Paisley snr, "Pope Lundy1" is still a fully functioning preacher while shoring up a murdering, lying, money grabbing, self-serving, self-seeking excuse of a "government."
Paisley jnr, "Tumble Down Dick" is so dishonest he cannot tell people which of his "TWO" houses he resides in !!!It seems quite a number of professing Christians have been using Christianity as a stepping stone to power, infamy and the persuit of riches. The cliches of "standing for the Lord" and standing to respresent their fellow Ulstermen were not even used as cliches.....they were and are downright lies.
6 comments:
Hi Sam Its Not A House I Want Its A Mansion Just Beyond The Blue Rapture Sweet. lol Paperman
no
hi sam no houses for me its a mansion just beyond The Blue lol Paperman
Slowly but surely the truth will come out.
WHAT IS IT THAT THEY DON'T WANT US TO KNOW ?
Department 'hiding facts behind procedure' – MEP
THE Department of the Environment and Planning Service were last night accused of "using the cloak of procedure" to avoid a freedom of information (FoI) request to publish documents relating to the Giant's Causeway Visitors' Centre discussions.
MEP Jim Nicholson has been told that his FoI queries on the matter will not be answered because it is not in the public interest to have disclosure at this time.
DECISION
He called this decision "bizarre" and added "there has been almost unprecedented interest from the public, the media and elected representatives" with regard to Environment Minister Arlene Foster's announcement last month that she is "minded" to grant approval to Seymour Sweeney's Seaport Ltd private application to build the centre.
The MEP said: "Despite what the department say it is clearly in the public interest to disclose the information. I am deeply shocked that they have chosen not to do this."
He told the News Letter it would only fuel public concern over the controversy and the DUP's role in it.
Mrs Foster revealed on September 10 that Seaport Ltd's plans had, in her view, "considerable merit".
SPECULATION
She had no idea, then, that Mr Sweeney was a DUP member, nor that Ian Paisley and Ian Paisley Jnr had lobbied for the application.
But Mr Nicholson was, in particular, interested in the Planning Service's report to the minister on the Seaport application – withheld from public view, amid speculation it urges some caution about the project.
The MEP asked to see the report, all other departmental documentation, on the Sweeney application, and any correspondence between Department of Enterprise Minister Nigel Dodds and Minister Foster on the future of the visitors' centre (as Mr Dodds, also on September 10, withdrew support for a publicly backed venture).
Planning Service accepted "strong public interest" in the matter and the need for transparency and accountability, with regard to decisions by the DoE and minister.
But it also noted there had not been a final decision yet.
It said: "As regards the report from the Planning Service to the minister, I wish to advise you this is an internal document which, in our opinion, falls within the terms of the exception under regulation 12 (4) (e) of the Regulations which states that – 'a public authority may refuse to disclose information to the extent that the request involves the disclosure of internal communications'."
The letter went on to say: "It is essential that the minister has the time and space required to fully consider all the issues and advice provided before reaching a fully- formed view on the issue at hand. The department believes that this process would be substantially prejudiced by disclosure of advice and guidance provided to the minister prior to a decision being taken.
"The department is therefore of the opinion that the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosure at this time."
Mr Nicholson said this raised more serious questions.
These included:
lDoE/Planning Service say the minister has not yet taken a final decision on the application. Why then did the minister disclose that she was of a mind to approve Seymour Sweeney's application?
lIf the DoE Minister has not made her mind up – why then did Tourism Minister Nigel Dodds, on the very same day as the DoE Minister made her announcement, withdraw DETI support for the DETI/NI Tourist Board plans for a visitors' centre at the Giant's Causeway?
lDoE has said it does not hold any correspondence between the DoE and the DETI Minister on the issue, yet both ministers made announcements on the visitors' centre almost simultaneously in the Assembly, on the same day.
lWho are the DOE to decide what the public interest is? Just what are the department hiding?
Commenting further, Mr Nicholson said: "The department is hiding behind the cloak of procedure, refused to disclose the information I requested. In light of what has transpired in recent weeks I find this decision completely bizarre."
Last Updated: 31 October 2007 8:39 AM
Page 1 of 1
Comment on this Story
In order to post comments
Sam ...did i not see that someone wrote that this is the ploy that
dr.paisley will use to stay in as the head of the fpc come nov-dec.that he is in the company of castro -chavaz-putin and this guy.
Is this not the common ploy employed by all despots who refuse to relinquish power?
Mr.paisley Prints
found this at the drudge report
Pakistan's Musharraf Declares Emergency; Supreme Court Judges Reject...
Army Takes Control...
...troops deployed inside state-run TV, radio stations
Telephone lines down...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sam: I found this link to Slugger O’Tooles’ site at Christ My Hero blogspot! It turns out that Paisley was going to be a trustee for Mr. Sweeney’s Causeway -Development.
Thought I would share it with you and your readers. There are a number of “active links” within the article, so those who wish to access them must go directly to the site:
-------
http://sluggerotoole.com/index.php/weblog/lottery-fund-decision-absolute-rubbish-paisley/
-------
Thursday, October 04, 2007
Lottery fund decision “absolute rubbish” - Paisley
The Belfast Telegraph’s David Gordon has unearthed a letter written by the DUP leader, and now First Minister, Ian Paisley in 2003 to the Heritage Lottery Fund after they had turned down an application by controversial developer Seymour Sweeney for a grant for the Giants’ Causeway World Heritage Trust connected to his proposed development - of which Mr Paisley was to be a trustee.
Written on headed Commons paper, it denounced the grounds for turning down the grant bid as “absolute rubbish”. It also claimed, more than once, that Mr Sweeney’s visitor centre plans had the support of UNESCO, the UN body which oversees world heritage sites like the Causeway. It said: “ UNESCO saw and approved the plans, and were very impressed by the proposal.”
A claim which UNESCO have already denied. Another possible twist below the fold.
More...
End of Article
---------------
Regards,
Mr. Paisley Prints
Post a Comment