His legacy, "wood, hay and stubble." PopeLundy1 would be better not giving any interviews he only condemns himself further with every lie he utters.
"I think my greatest achievement was to convince Sinn Fein that (I would go into government) if they did the three things I said they had to do - support the rule of the law with real support for the police, face up to the fact they wouldn't get a united Ireland tomorrow and there must be recognition of the majority viewpoint, which is not a united Ireland and also helping us get terrorism out of our country altogether."
The first lie was telling the people he had to do a deal or "Plan B" would be imposed!
The second lie was telling the people he had done the deal because IRA/MI5 had met 7 stipulated conditions!
His third and latest lie is claiming IRA/MI5 would help us to get "terrorism" out of our country altogether!
If you take this interview seriously then you can only conclude by this statement he deliberately set out to con the Unionist community into accepting a gross betrayal.
"I said if you can do that then I can do something - I think I can bring the majority of the Protestant people to say alright, we will have you serving (in government) but it's up to you."
If anyone cares to read the article for themselves I am sure they will spot many more lies!
The interviewer should have asked him does he know what a "SUPERINJUNCTION" is?
1 Corinthians 3:11-13
11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;
13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.
7 comments:
Sam,
Though I have never read anything about him that comes remotely close to an apology, is it remotely possible that Paisley carries an inordinate amount of guilt for the part he played in fanning the sectarian violence of "the Troubles" by his inflammatory rhetoric / preaching, and that is the reason he made peace with his enemies to ease his conscience?
or . .
Do you concur with this comment made at another site in connection with this article:
"The Grand Old Duke of York is a lying and treacherous Arminian Fundamentalist who would sell his soul to the devil for money and power and his allegiance with Roman Terrorists shows that he would share power with the devil himself to advance his own agenda. The Arminian Doctor has been exposed as a Provo-loving traitor who wants to try and get the Ulster people railroaded into an all-Ireland State is a dangerous man who should be treated with the derision that he and his hideous party so richly deserve."
Do you think Paisley is a Jesuit plant? I know he founded the FPC, but perhaps ROME backed and funded him in his venture. Do you think preachers have any business being politicians? Await your thoughts!
Mrs. O'Leary
Sam,
Postscript to my comment:
I found this comment at the Bel Tel made in connection with the article:
'You won't find the moral high ground there, Gerry'
Link: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/you-wont-find-the-moral-high-ground-there-gerry-14694119.html#ixzz0gkjyZujo
“Should Ian Paisley be allowed to call himself a minister and speak about a god despite the fact that he was involved with
The Ulster Constitution Defence Committee.
The Ulster Protestant Volunteers.
Third Force.
Ulster Resistance.
All of you need to wise up.
You know, I am not necessarily a great fan of soccer but I am a confirmed Liverpool fan. That entitles me to have an opinion on soccer. I'm sure you can work that analogy out for yourselves.”
Posted by Ulysses32
Sam, is this what this commentor is saying about Paisley true?
Mrs. O'Leary
mrs;
I have both your comments but have published this first.
I can only give you an answer based upon what I am currently aware of, however we do not know what further revelations will be brought to light in the future.
I think he started of genuinely but he, or one of, or possibly both he and one of his family members has become badly compromised, so he is now an instrument of those who brought about the compromise.
As to preachers being politicians, most people would not have the ability to be a preacher and a politician. I have nothing against a preacher being a politician if the need arises.
Genuine preachers will attract able politicians to hear them, so in most circumstances they should not need to be politicians.
Google
"blackcoated preachers of the revolution"
Where would America be without preachers giving "political direction?"
One of the things about Ian Paisley you may not be aware of is the fact that he did genuinely win the support of a large number of Unionists.
A good deal of his credibilty came in the early 1960s and 1970s when everything he forecast seemed to come to pass. It is now clear a sinister intelligence agency can fabricate such scenarios, perhaps without the players themselves realising it.
This is just my opinion, you can draw your own conclusions.
mrs;
Sorry about this, this is a response to the article claiming Paisley`s "involvement" in a whole list of "organisations."
The only way the truth will be known about these organisations and his involvement will be if the people who were also involved speak out. I have no personal knowledge of any of these events.
Most of the activity mentioned in the article took place in the 60s and 70s. At that time a great many true Bible believing Christians did believe there was an imminent threat of a rebellion fueled by the RCC and they also felt they were being betrayed by the British government.
You can obviously work out yourself there is something wrong when someone or some group of people have to try and start one organisation after another.
If the people who start the first organisation were not bluffing, there will never be a need for another one will there?
Sir Edward Carson is an iconic figure in Irish history. He was instrumental in bringing about the formation of "The Ulster Volunteer Force."
What we will never know is; was he bluffing? would he have actually lead them against the British Army and the Southern Irish rebels?
We do know from history the ordinary people where not bluffing as the events of the Somme clearly show.
The internet will show that all the organisations mentioned in the article did in fact exist, what Ian Paisley's "involvement" was, is as they say in Israel......."something to which there is no proof"
Thank you for taking time to address the points I raised about Ian Paisley.
Sermon Audio has just posted the NEWS LETTER article . . Ian Paisley: 'I did too much in my day'
I thought I would share Ehud's comments with you. Like yourself and to his credit, Ehud speaks plainly and does not mince words.
News Item2/28/10 5:54 AM
ehud | belfast
"of course ian paisley had too many jobs non of which he did well. Had he been called to the ministry then that was his vocation ,but adding 3 very well parliamentry jobs with excellent pensions paid by tax payers,showing total neglect to his calling -hence could be called a hirling not caring for the sheep -could be alleged by the knowing many.
Check attendance levels at the various institutions interesting reading.Then at the sunset of his life laughing with blood thirsty murderous who murdered my brothers and sisters in The Lord.
Had he kept to preaching and not agigtated in politics this poor land would not be in the sorry mess it is in.
There are very many believers really hurting from this man`s overt folly.That is the truth people should know,my consolation is that God`s knows and feels for his wounded people"
mrs;
thx for your info.
I do not look at sermonfraudio very much nowadays. I checked out you comment, the particular thread has been closed down and the comment removed.
On the subject of Ian Paisley, perhaps you may have some information about him which we do not possess in N.Ireland? fell free to comment.
Sam wrote:
"On the subject of Ian Paisley, perhaps you may have some information about him which we do not possess in N.Ireland? fell free to comment."
No Sam I do not possess any other information other than that which I have gleaned from your blog and other N.I. blogs / websites, i.e. 'A Tangled Web', Jim Allister's site, which do not present Ian Paisley in a very good light. The two comments I have shared with you speak volumes, as do your current and past posts.
I have also read various commentaries on Ian Paisley's life, which again cast him into a very negative light in terms of his duplicitous career as preacher and politician.
Mrs. O'Leary
Mrs. O'Leary
Post a Comment