Popular Posts Of Last Seven Days
-
It is 15:23pm Monday 2nd June 2008. The Pink Presbyterian denomination has had from the 13th Oct 2006 until now to condemn the St Andrews A... -
Mervy Lundy aka Mervyn Storey The whole thing is ludicrous. I mean who would have an "affair" with thon (the last bit is in Ulster... -
The Spirit of Laodicea that is! The Pink Presbyterian Theological Ostrich It is 20:2pm Monday 31st March 2008. The Pink Presbyterian denomin... -
A very misleading article has appeared in the Telegraph. It does seem to be an effort of the "British" government trying to make i...
-
The Antichrist and his dumb American puppet. The Antichrist`s intended travel plans are featuring in N.Ireland news items at this present t... -
The title logo is from the main page of the European Institute of Lukewarm Studies. It is glaringly obvious they are trying to ignore th... -
2 Corinthians 6:2 (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the...
-
This is one of PopeLundy1s daughters, it is thought her facebook wall is currently the hottest in cyberspace. Must be real bad blood betwe... -
One "troubles" instigator who ended up a patsy! It is claimed a certain Captain James Kelly spent his "holidays" in Bel...
Friday, 22 April 2011
IT`S NOT JUST NECESSARILY THE RICH AND FAMOUS
Ryan Giggs thinks he is George Best!
The "super injunction fiasco" continues in the UK. The Sun newspaper carries an article claiming 26 individuals are benefitting from gagging orders. Going from the article it appears many of them are very,very wealthy.
Another section of the article states it is not just the rich and famous who can obtain the gagging orders, "professional people" can get them too. That sounds very like Willie and Jeffrey.
"And it's not necessarily the rich and famous. They may be professional people like doctors and lawyers who have some prominence but aren't household names like John Terry."
I suppose seedy individuals who play an important role in carrying out evil government subterfuges can get them as well. That sounds like Willie and Jeffrey too.
Just to show how ludicrous the whole thing is I will name the people who are being named on internet activity as being the "superinjuncton hypocrites" as the article calls them. I personally doubt if they are as hypocritical as those creeps who infest the "Tabloid journalism" industry.
Ryan Giggs is linked to Imogen Thomas. I had never heard of Imogen Thomas until this last week.
Two names are floating about relating to the "actor" and Helen Wood super- injunction, somebody called Ewan McGregor and somebody called Hugh Bonneville. I have to confess I have never heard of either of them.
The most crazy injunction which forbids anyone EVER being named is linked to Alan Shearer and Gabby Logan. I had never heard of Gabby Logan until the other day. Had to look up who she was.
If you are wondering why I never heard of these people, the reason is simple, I do not have TV, therefore I have no idea who many of them are.
Now, do you really think I am goIng to be prosecuted or fined for naming people whose identities most of the UK populaton is now aware of?
If very rich people can obtain "superinjunctions," I am sure the very rich and very violent can obtain "super-super-super-injunctions."
Something stinks about the judges who are so willing to hand out these gagging orders, perhaps their personal lives leave a lot to be desired.
Galatians 6:7
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Well I guess you are without sins so you can throw stones based on gossip and rumours. Good on ya mate.
Thx for your comment Paul;
A famous portion of scripture dealing with the subject you have raised. No doubt you have never heard of it.
When you get some time you may find it helpful to do a study on "The Imputed Righteousness of Christ."
1John 1:5-10
5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:
7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
It's not the judges that are the problem here, I blame the spineless media we have in this country.
I don't have any respect at all for the journalists who are colluding in this massive cover-up. If I was a journalist I would consider it to be the highlight of my career to be sent to jail for doing nothing more than reporting the truth.
A. Lee, how exactly do you propose a journalist gets an illegal article into a newspaper without any subs or editor noticing it?
By 'journalists' I'm including editors, publishers and broadcasters - who certainly have the power to get the stories out to the public.
Even the lowliest of journalists have access to the internet and could publish their stories on blogs or forums.
By the way, I don't understand why you're describing these articles as 'illegal' - how can it ever be anything other than righteous to tell the truth?
You've never heard of Ewan MacGregor and Hugh Bonneville? Whos is this god character? At least Ewan and Hugh are real
1.Psalm 14:1
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14:1-3
Psalm 53:1
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.
Post a Comment