The Queen was joined by the Pope at a Babylonian religious service to celebrate her golden wedding anniversary.
White Pope Ratzinger was not there;
Black Pope Kolvenbach was not there;
Pink Pope Lundy1 was there, with the moderator of the PFC, his wife Eileen.
Dr Paisley attends Westminster Abbey Queen's Golden Wedding service
The form of the service in Westminster Abbey
These two links are from the Burning Bush website.
Popular Posts Of Last Seven Days
-
It is 15:23pm Monday 2nd June 2008. The Pink Presbyterian denomination has had from the 13th Oct 2006 until now to condemn the St Andrews A... -
Mervy Lundy aka Mervyn Storey The whole thing is ludicrous. I mean who would have an "affair" with thon (the last bit is in Ulster... -
The Spirit of Laodicea that is! The Pink Presbyterian Theological Ostrich It is 20:2pm Monday 31st March 2008. The Pink Presbyterian denomin... -
The Antichrist and his dumb American puppet. The Antichrist`s intended travel plans are featuring in N.Ireland news items at this present t... -
2 Corinthians 6:2 (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the...
-
One "troubles" instigator who ended up a patsy! It is claimed a certain Captain James Kelly spent his "holidays" in Bel... -
A z-list nonentity has come clean about his legal injunction. Another Super Injunction has come into the news. It is just another story ... -
A very happy looking Iris Lundy. She must have been going to meet Kirk that day! The PSNI now find themselves the focal point at a crucial m...
10 comments:
Do you remember Paisley refusing invitation to Charles & diana wedding
Another flip !
What would have happened to ANY FP who had attended Charles and Diana`s wedding? They most likely would have been shunned by the entire church!
Sam,
you are a hypocrite.
You run down the Free church at every opportunity, and yet a little bird tells me that you are a regular attender yourself.
MWT:
Methinks you and your little bird, the canary, are a bit confused.
When you heard your bird say SAM, you thought he meant Sam Flanigan.
Not so . . he really meant Sam Morrison, and I offer as proof the following comment made by Sam Morrison posted recently on What Need of Further Lies 2.
________________
Sammy said...
BA,
It's a one off post because the blog got mentioned in the News Letter.
MMII,
Ian Paisley is the greatest traitor in the history of Ulster. The funding of sodomite groups by his department (for which he has ultimate reasonability) is a scandal.
His entering into a coalition with murderous SF/IRA is both politically and morally indefensible. It is a move I will oppose with every fiber of my being. Because this blog is no longer publishing do not assume that my views have mellowed.
I am in receipt of no letters or other communications from Presbytery or Ian Paisley and certainly was party to no "deal" dreamt up by people on the other side of the Atlantic.
_____________
Now MWT, it appears that Sam Morrison who left the DUP, yet remains in the FPC as a member of Kilskeery FPC, is the hypocrite.
The real question is, how can Sam Morrison, or Ivan Foster, for that matter, remain in the FPC?
We await your response. In the future, keep your SAMs straight!
Zam Moreson
what I have written I have written
TO mwt.....
your comment is meant to be profound??? in a childish like manner????
but you still owe answers at my site to the questions that i have asked of you,we are still waiting.
When may we expect your answers ?
By the way in an adult manner.
Profound?
If you knew your Bible you would have recognised it as a quotation from John 19 v22.
it was the answer given to the Chief priest of the Jews when he sought to have the true inscription recorded against Christ removed. He was told in no uncertain terms "What I have written I have written".
You have sought to discredit the report I brought against Sam Flanagan, (though I note that Sam to his credit has not denied the veracity of it), so you received the same answer as the twisting pharisees, "What I have written I have written".
As to your site, I have but two comments to make.
1. it is of such a poor cut and paste job that it does not even deserve to be read.
2. I see no questions addressed to me to answer?
MWT....
Again you speak with child-like
statements...............
your first statement reads" DOES NOT EVEN DESERVE TO BE READ"
But your second statement states that "YOU CONTINUE TO READ IT "
Just how old are you ?perhaps the site "You Tube would be better site for you to "HANG OUT "
ZAMMY
Proverb 26:4,5 "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit".
Zammy, you really are a half-wit.
You have no answer to the veracity of my original message, so you attack the messenger.
comment?
As to your site, my two statements are not mutually exclusive.
You site is not worth reading, but in an effort of fairness I waded through your gibberish to find that the questions that I have not answered for you, do not in fact exist.
MWT.......
As you once said "a little bird has told me that a sign will be put up on this site that will read
"YOU MUST BE OVER 21 YEARS OF AGE TO ENTER"NO CHILDREN ALLOWED".....
I suggest that you put your web blog up at again . P;ease do your work there as you say you have no intrest in things of this earth.
And for the record you did good work there .
"END "
Post a Comment