To be? or not to be? that is the question?
To be a Lundy that is!
To be a Lundy that is!
Poor Gregory "the great" is in a predicament. Lundyism is not so appealing to him anymore. One problem is he cannot seem to quite make up his mind about it! Another problem he has is facing up to the truth.....he still calls it the "St Andrews Agreement", waken up Gregory call it by its proper name the "Eileen Paisley Agreement."
Gregory may not have been in this mess had he belonged to a good Bible believing denomination which could come to a clear cut stance regarding deceitful behaviour. Unfortunately Gregory is a Pink Presbyterian! Let us not forget he also belongs to the political party who lambasted "dissidents" with the Trimblite catchphrase, "There is NO ALTERNATIVE", so what are you going to do Gregory? after all, there is no alternative!!!!!!!!
You can seek an audience with the Antichrist should he happen to call this way during 2oo8, he will give you the advice you need. On the other hand you could look for some stirring sermon from sermonfraudio.com on a text such as;
Isaiah 59:19 So shall they fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun. When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him.
Isaiah 59:18-20 (in Context) Isaiah 59 (Whole Chapter)
Two sermon titles that should catch the eye of any Lundy;
Political Hypocrisy at Jesus' Trial
A Warning to Dishonest Public Officials
New year will decide fate of Agreement, says Campbell
"On the St Andrews Agreement, Mr Campbell said “the most obvious questions that people will be asking are: is it delivering and are steps being taken to ensure that the strategic direction this process is taking us in is the right one?”
Who is the most likely group to disband in 2008? the Babylonian mass murdering ringleaders of the IRA or the Pink Presbyterian Church?????????
Just remember one thing about Pope Lundy1, "He hasn`t gone away ye know!"
2 comments:
Thoughts on Plan B . . .
Could the real dreaded Plan B that Paisley was threatened with have been that unless he agreed to form a power-sharing alliance with SF/IRA, he would face prosecution on "conspiracy" charges?
Perhaps he was blackmailed after all, and after consulting with the Baroness (who showed him the light), Paisley was persuaded to opt for Plan A.
BBC article that follows suggests that this may well have been the case.
////////////////////////////
Published: 2007/12/28 09:09:27 GMT
Stormont discussed Paisley arrest Secret Public Record Office files from 1977 show senior Stormont officials believed Ian Paisley was associated with loyalist paramilitaries.
The remarks made by the officials reveal they considered arresting the now first minister for conspiracy.
Almost 400 confidential state papers from 30 years ago were released but 50 files remain closed.
Among them are documents relating to the economic activities of paramilitary organisations.
The remarks on Mr Paisley were recorded in the minutes of a conversation among senior Stormont officials during the United Ulster Action Council Strike.
It was suggested that the DUP leader should be arrested for conspiracy.
The documents also show that the military was ready to seize power stations if workers threatened a stoppage.
State papers released in the Irish Republic reveal that Lord Mountbatten, murdered by the IRA in 1979, was in favour of Irish unity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/7162580.stm
Which begs the question . . was a percentage of the offerings given by the faithful members of the FPC for the "spread of the gospel" utilized to fund/support paramilitary operations?
Mrs. O'Leary
Post a Comment